Even if we don't go this route (although many philosophers and scientists do), it's evident that consciousness is a marvel that has to be explained, and that the atheist-materialist approach is incapable of doing so.
What atheists may get wrong – Don Karl Juravin
All of this is predicated on the premise that GOD is truly "complex." Many philosophers and theologians before Dawkins claimed that GOD is not at all complicated, but rather the goal of the world until any definition could explain it.
Where does the comparison of intelligent works come from? – Don Karl Juravin
This argument has received some feedback. We cannot create a comparison between clocks and other familiar works of art and the world and living creatures, according to philosopher David Hume, because we know that clocks are man-made.
Why should we go deeper in proving God’s existence? – Don Karl Juravin asks
It is critical to emphasize that numerous pencils have been broken and pens have run out of ink in the midst of each of these debates.
Is there a God? Any God? – Don Karl Juravin asks
Philosophical evidence for the existence of GOD is relatively new. Belief in GOD is essentially intuitive, and it is sometimes accompanied by religious and spiritual experiences.
The paradox of Maltese-ism – Don Karl Juravin
The attitude that GOD is evil is called "Maltese" in philosophy, and it is no coincidence that it is difficult to find serious philosophers who support it. It is a paradox by its own - Don Karl Juravin